Government should not dismiss permanent cut to tourism and hospitality VAT – Carmichael


Orkney and Shetland MP, Alistair Carmichael, has called for the Government to assess the potential benefits of a permanent reduction in VAT for tourism and hospitality in order to give businesses confidence in future growth. Hospitality businesses have been some of the hardest-hit throughout the pandemic, being shut down or severely curtailed for almost a year and with little prospect of a quick return to normal tourist seasons in the short term.

In a parliamentary question, Mr Carmichael asked the Chancellor: “If his Department will make an assessment of the potential merits of making permanent the five per cent reduced rate of VAT for the tourism and hospitality sector.”

Responding for the Government, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Jesse Norman MP replied:

“The temporary reduced rate of VAT was introduced on 15 July to support the cash flow and viability of about 150,000 businesses and to protect over 2.4 million jobs in the hospitality and tourism sectors. As announced at Budget, this relief will now run until 31 March 2022, with a staggered return to the standard rate. Applying this relief permanently would come at a significant cost to the Exchequer, and that cost would have to be balanced by increased taxes elsewhere, or reductions in Government spending.”

Reacting to the statement, Mr Carmichael said:

“I appreciate concerns about the Government’s finances after the pandemic, but we should not dismiss out of hand the potential that incentivising growth in hospitality could be a net gain in the long term. The Treasury seems to want to maintain tax levels for the sake of it.

“When I was a minister we cut the duty on spirits and instead of dropping, revenues went up. If crafted properly, studies show that a targeted cut to hospitality and tourism VAT can make a meaningful difference to growth. Small businesses in rural and island communities should be the first priority.

“I make no bold claims to be an economic expert. Given the need to bolster growth, however, it does not seem unreasonable to look at the potential benefits of a longer term cut to support some of the hardest-hit businesses. We need to put the recovery first.”


Share this post on social media:

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or Email.